The story began at the beginning, as the process of restoring the painting ended up being just as controversial as the initial vandalism.
All told, the restoration took four years, and eventually cost the museum over $1 million, drawing the museum into a long defamation suit with the
Daniel Goldreyer, the conservator who is in charge of work. Goldreyer was initially employed by the Stedelijk for the reason that he claimed he would be able to restore the painting in 98%.
The attack was not accompanied by the "shimmering effect" to the red, which created a sense of depth"
www.unitedearners.comunitedearnersunited earnersWebsiteunited earners comwww.stockmediacity.comstockmediacitystock media cityWebsitestock media city comwww.finalbusiness.co.ukfinalbusinessfinal business
Short story about the Stedelijk required that the painting examined for forensic reasons. They were told by the restoration expert that they had just applied a simple roller to cover the painting.
Matte paint for house was sprayed to the entire canvas. This was something that he vigorously denied. It was evidently different but it still had the same features.